A Brief Philatelic History of Victoria
Chapter 3. The First Stamps and Lithography
Stamp production in Victoria commenced in January 1850,
a full 18 months before the colony officially became
independent. While it was a nearly universally accepted
practice among the colonies of the British Empire to
have their postage stamps designed and printed in England
and shipped to them ready for use, that was not the
case in Victoria. Stamp design and production was developed
within the colony, and with only isolated exceptions,
that practice remained until 1912.
In those days, Victoria was a fledgling colony in the
most remote part of the Empire. There was no paper manufacture
in the colony, nor was there any available supply from
any nearby sources. There were no sophisticated manufacturing
capabilities to produce printing presses or other equipment.
Ingenuity, improvisation and dogged determination were
the engines that drove stamp production in the early
days. A study of the stamp production in Victoria in
those early days provides a fascinating window to a
different time and a different world.
When confronted with the challenge of producing those
first issues in the 1850s in Victoria, the printers
reviewed the available options and decided to utilize
a printing method called lithography. To understand
fully and to appreciate many of the philatelic issues
that arise from those fascinating early printings, it
is necessary to have a basic understanding of the fundamentals
of lithography.

Five different stamps were printed with lithography
during the 1850’s in Victoria. They were the 1d,
2d, and 3d Half Lengths, the 2d Queen-on-Throne, and
the one shilling octagon.
Lithography was discovered by a German inventor in the
early 1800s. It is based on the simple principal that
oil and water do not mix. To produce a lithographic
printing, the following steps were followed:
First, an engraver was required, to engrave an image
of the object that is to be printed onto a die. In most
cases, the die was made from a block of steel, milled
on one side to be a flat surface. The engraver would
etch lines into the surface of the die where the lines
of ink would ultimately appear in the printing. The
etching was done in exactly the same dimensions as the
final printing, and all of the printing lines needed
to generate the desired image had to be etched, without
error, into the die - the only difference being that
the die was etched as a mirror image of the design that
was to appear in the final printing.
Once completed, the die would consist of the original
flat surface on which no inking was to take place, and
the many small hollowed etching lines that comprised
the design of the stamp. The die was smeared with a
special greasy ink that was prepared specially for lithographic
printing. Once the die had been inked, the flat surface
of the die was wiped clean, so that the etching lines
had ink in them, and the flat surface had none. A dampened
piece of specially prepared paper was then placed onto
the die, and a scraper was drawn across the surface
of the paper. This would have the effect of forcing
the paper into the crevices of the die and absorbing
the ink from the etching lines onto the paper. When
removed, the lithographic paper would now hold the image
of the final stamp image.
Once the image was impressed onto a piece of lithographic
paper, the paper with the inked image was placed face
down in position onto the limestone printing stone.
The printer would then draw a scraper across the lithographic
paper, thereby “transferring” a mirror image
of the design onto the limestone surface.
Making a Print
Once the image was impressed onto the limestone surface,
the printers could use the principle that oil and water
do not mix, to print the image. Once the greased ink
image was transferred onto the printing stone, the limestone
could be dampened with water, and then inked with printing
ink in the colour specified for the stamp issue. The
ink would be repelled by the water and cling only to
the portions of the printing stone that had been inked
previously. With the ink sitting only on the engraving
lines as they appeared on the original die (being a
mirror image of the final design), it was then possible
to put a sheet of printing paper on the stone and apply
some mild pressure – thereby transferring the
ink on the stone to the sheet of printing paper. The
result was a printed sheet containing an image of the
stamp in the desired colour.
This process of printing directly from the die would
reproduce a single image of the die. To complete the
process of printing an entire sheet of stamps, it was
necessary to transfer a number of lithographic images
to a printing plate. The printing plates used were blocks
of limestone that had a milled surface large enough
to accommodate the sheet of stamps that was to be printed.
There were two choices:
Direct Transfers
The first option was to ink the die as many times as
there were stamps on the final sheet, using the procedure
described above, positioning and impressing each separate
image onto the printing stone, one by one, until the
required sheet size was achieved. As you can imagine,
this was a slow and tedious process. To create a small
sheet of 5 rows of 6, it would require 30 separate processes
to create the printing plate – for larger sheets
it would be even more tedious!
Intermediate Transfers
The second option was to undertake an intermediate
step, using a transfer stone. In this case, the printer
would ink the die and transfer, say, 10 or 25 individual
images onto a printing stone that was significantly
smaller than the final printing stone. The images would
be applied to the transfer stone one at a time, - such
that the completed transfer stone could be used as a
`multiple die’. From the transfer stone, multiple
images could be made onto lithographic paper and applied
to the final printing stone. A printing stone designed
to print a sheet of 100 stamps could be created with
10 lithographic transfers from the transfer stone, instead
of 100 individual images taken from the original die.
This saved a lot of time, but the final quality suffered,
because the printer was using an image of an image to
get the final product. This would be the same as taking
a scan of an object, printing it on your printer and
rescanning the printout, creating a second generation
image. A loss of resolution was inevitable.
It is worth noting that the earliest printings of the
Half Length issues were printed using the more laborious
technique of transferring images directly from the die
to the printing stone. These were proven by Purves to
have been printed in small sheets of 30 stamps. As the
demand for stamps increased, however, there was a need
to produce larger sheets, and the printers resorted
to the use of transfer stones. The result is that the
later issues have less detail and more flaws in the
printed images.
|
 |
The stamp in the left scan was printed using
a direct transfer from the die to the printing
plate, whereas the stamp in the right scan was
printed using an intermediate transfer stone.
Note how detailed and vibrant the print on the
left is, when compared to the later printing
|
It is also important to understand that lithography
was a great method of printing, provided that the printers
did not want to make unlimited numbers of prints. With
each successive print lifted from the printing stone,
the quality of the lithographic stone deteriorated,
and after a few hundred or, at most, a few thousand
prints, it became necessary to mill the surface of the
limestone to remove the old printing surface, and start
over again. Thus, in the course of printing Victoria’s
Half Lengths, a number of printing stones were used,
as old ones wore out and new ones were needed to meet
the increasing demand for postage stamps.
There are other aspects of lithography that made life
difficult for the printers, but these difficulties and
the methods used by the printers to resolve them, have
been the source of fascination for philatelists for
150 years.
The Lithography Printing Procedure
Using lithography, the steps required to print a sheet
of stamps (including use of a transfer stone), are as
follows:
- An engraver made a die by etching individual lines
into a small block of steel to create a mirror image
of a stamp design .
- he printer inked the die with lithographic ink
and transferred the image to a piece of lithographic
paper, resulting in a printed image of the stamp design
on the lithographic paper.
- The lithographic paper was placed face down onto
a transfer stone and the image was `transferred’
to the stone by drawing a scraper across the lithographic
paper. This deposited a mirror image of a single stamp
design onto the transfer stone
- This process was repeated until there was the desired
number of stamp images on the transfer stone.
- The transfer stone was wetted, and then inked.
The added ink adhered to the previously inked areas
and avoided the wet areas of the transfer stone.
- A piece of dampened lithographic paper was placed
faced down onto the transfer stone and the image on
the transfer stone was `transferred’ to the
lithographic paper by drawing a scraper across the
paper.
- Next, the lithographic paper with the transfer group
image on it was laid face down into position on the
printing stone and the image was transferred to the
stone by drawing a scraper across the lithographic
paper. This deposited a mirror image of the transfer
stone onto the printing stone.
- This process of depositing the transfer group image
onto the printing stone was repeated until the printing
stone had the desired number of images for a full
sheet of stamps.
- Once the printing stone was completed, stamp production
could begin. The printing stone was wetted and inked
with the desired color of printer’ s ink. The
ink would adhere to the previously inked areas and
would avoid the wet areas of the printing stone.
- A sheet of paper was placed onto the printing stone
and put through a printing press that pressed the
paper onto the printing stone, thereby transferring
the inked image on the printing stone to the surface
of the paper.
- The newly printed sheet of stamps was hung to dry
for a few minutes and then stacked and placed into
inventory.
- To produce further sheets of stamps, the printers
would consecutively (i) prepare the printing stone
by wetting and inking it, (ii) place a sheet of paper
onto the printing stone and (iii) draw it through
the printing press.
Plating Lithographic Issues
Even though the best limestone was carefully selected,
it remained a fact of life that no limestone was perfect.
Innate flaws in the limestone meant that tiny spots
on the limestone might not absorb any of the greasy
inks used in the making the printing images. In such
cases, the printing ink would not stick, and there would
be a constant “ white spot” at that position
on the sheet. In other cases, the limestone might not
absorb water, making the printing ink cling, resulting
in constant “color spots” at a particular
position on the sheet. The result of these tiny anomalies
means that each stamp on the sheet contains tiny differences
that act like a signature. With the use of blocks and
other multiples, it has become possible to “map”
the locations of each stamp to its’ original position
on the printing stone. Identifying and positioning the
stamps in the proper positions is known as Plating,,
and a collection of stamps so organized is known as
a Plate Reconstruction.
Where transfer stones were used, the situation is even
more complex and interesting. Since the image was first
impressed onto a transfer stone which would have its
own characteristic flaws, and then onto the printing
stone, the stamps that were so printed, contain two
sets of constant flaws, called primary flaws
(from the transfer stone), and secondary flaws
(from the final printing stone). This makes it possible
to reconstruct the transfer stone, called a transfer
group reconstruction. As the transfer group
would have been repeated a number of times on a single
sheet, it is also possible to reconstruct the complete
sheet (an arduous task where larger sheets are involved)
 |
Shown, is a reconstruction of the transfer group of 24, used in the last Campbell
& Fergusson printing of the 1d Half-Length.
Each stamp in the group has tiny flaws, which
are uniquely characteristic to its position in
the grouping, the result of corresponding flaws
in the limestone plate on which the transfer group
was originally constructed. Identifying the individual
characteristics can be challenging, even when
the descriptions of the faults are known. Specialized
philatelic journals can provide the information
required to reconstruct such a grouping |
Lithographic Varieties and Flaws
Finally, there are some interesting varieties and flaws
which resulted from an occasional error made by the
printers while they were preparing the printing stones.
On occasion, during the process of transferring the
image to the final printing stone, the lithographic
paper with the greasy ink would crease, causing a Creased
Transfer. (The most famous creased transfer
variety from Victoria is the TVO variety found in the
2d Queen on Throne issue). Creased transfers normally
appear on only one transfer group in the entire sheet,
making them scarce. On other occasions the transfer
paper was cut too small, creating a Cut Transfer.
Sometimes the dampened transfer paper shrank unevenly,
causing some distortion in the transferred image, called
a Squeezed Transfer. Other varieties
and flaws occurred when the transfer paper was being
applied to the printing stone. If the transfer paper
inadvertently touched the surface, but was immediately
lifted and adjusted into place, it could cause a Kiss
Print. On occasion, the transfer paper would
be damaged, and part of it was cut away, and replaced
with a new partial transfer image. Since the new partial
transfer would have different primary characteristics,
the stamps in those transfer groups are known as
Substituted Transfers. There are also a few
stamps which have Thumbprint Varieties,
created when the printer’s fingers had some lithographic
ink on them when handling the transfer paper. All of
these form a fascinating study for the specialist!

|
Illustrated is an example of a Kiss Print, where the printer touched the surface
of the printing stone with the lithographic paper
carrying the image of the transfer group, then,
shifted it into position, leaving the appearance
of a double print on the stamp, where parts of
the image was laid down. |
 |
An example of a Squeezed Transfer, which occurred when the dampened lithographic
paper shrank before it was laid down, causing
the image of the stamp to be slightly distorted.
In this example, the top edge of the stamp has
a convex curve along the top edge, and the top
of the stamp partly shown below is even more dramatically
convex shaped. |
Retouches
Finally, there is the issue of Retouches. Because of
the nature of lithographic printing, there were often
major flaws, where the image on the transfer stone,
or on the printing stone were damaged. Whenever these
became known to the printer, he would often resort to
retouching the image. To do this, he would usually remove
any of the remaining ink on the printing stone with
an acid brush then redraw the removed portion of the
image by hand, with a stylus and the greasy lithographic
ink. Often the results were crude and usually they were
worse than the original flaw they were designed to replace.
Retouches are a delight for the philatelist, however,
and many of them are exceedingly rare. If the retouch
occurred on the transfer stone, it would appear a number
of times on the printed sheet of stamps, but when the
retouch occurred directly on the printing stone, it
would appear only once in a sheet. In many cases, this
meant that only a few hundred copies were originally
printed, and, in most such cases, only a handful of
copies remain known to collectors today.
 |
One of the more spectacular
of all retouches found in Victoria’s stamps,
is this copy from Ham’s third printing of
the 3d Half-Lengths. The entire top right corner
has been crudely redrawn. Only 500 copies of this
retouch could have been issued, (once per sheet),
and only a handful of copies remain known today. |
|
Another of the rare
retouches found in the Half-Lengths. Look carefully
at the lower half of the right border. It has
been crudely redrawn with a couple of wavy lines
in an effort to fill in the very apparent white
space where the original border is missing. The
retouch was done with a stylus and acid, and all
retouches were not nearly as finely etched as
the original detail.
|
The early stamps of Victoria were all printed using
lithography and many collectors have dedicated a lifetime
to collecting and studying them. It is a fascinating
area, and the more you understand the processes involved,
the more intriguing they become!
REFERENCES: The Stamps of Victoria, Geoff Kellow
The Half Lengths of Victoria, J. Purves
Various Public Sources on Lithography, on the
internet
<< Previous
| Menu | Next >> |